|
|
|
|
|
|
What are Sea Ducks? |
|
Population Trends |
|
Harvest |
|
Threats |
|
The Sea Duck Joint Venture |
|
History |
|
Mission, Goals, Vision |
|
First Step Projects |
|
Partner Responsibilities |
|
Next Steps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adapted to life at sea and on land; generally
nest in freshwater wetlands and spend most of the year in marine
environments |
|
Most nest at northern latitudes |
|
Most nest on ground; some in tree cavities or
nest boxes |
|
Eat mostly invertebrate foods (shellfish,
crustaceans, insects); little vegetation; mergansers primarily fish-eaters |
|
Highly philopatric to breeding, molting, and
wintering areas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dabbling Ducks |
|
first breed at 1 year |
|
medium-large clutches |
|
moderate adult survival |
|
breed every year |
|
populations controlled more by annual changes in
factors controlling production |
|
better exploiters of ephemeral wetlands |
|
relatively larger portions can be harvested
annually |
|
|
|
|
Life history information is incomplete, biology
poorly understood |
|
Affiliations among breeding, molting, and
wintering areas unknown for most populations |
|
Accurate information on numbers, trends, and
distribution is lacking for most species |
|
Several populations show long term population
declines; causes unknown |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surveys
timed for dabbling duck nesting |
|
Do not
cover the core breeding distribution of about half the sea duck species |
|
Some
bird groups not identified to species |
|
|
|
BUT, surveys have been conducted consistently
for 40 years - trends warrant attention |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term population declines |
|
Not identified to species during surveys |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mostly black scoters |
|
Declines since late 1970s |
|
Greatest drop on Yukon Delta |
|
Mostly white-winged and surf scoters |
|
Declines less pronounced, but trends are
confounded by survey imprecision |
|
|
|
|
Data reflects Yukon Delta population; mainly
spectacled and some common eiders |
|
90% decline long term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No reliable quantitative data on population
trend |
|
Listed as threatened based on: |
|
Substantial decrease in nesting range in Alaska |
|
Reduction in overall numbers nesting in Alaska |
|
Virtually absent from former nesting areas on
Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant long term decline |
|
Stable over last decade |
|
Some important breeding areas not surveyed |
|
|
|
|
Similar declines in western Alaska tundra and
northern boreal forest over last 15 years |
|
|
|
|
Surveys suggest stable population in recent
years |
|
|
|
|
Barrow’s and common goldeneye not distinguished
during surveys |
|
Populations are stable or increasing in western
North America; Barrow’s a species of “special concern” in eastern North
America |
|
|
|
|
Long term increasing trend |
|
|
|
|
Long term increasing trend |
|
Red-breasted and common mergansers not
distinguished during surveys; no hoodeds |
|
|
|
|
No breeding population surveys, but they are
numerous in winter along the north Pacific and believed to be secure in
Alaska |
|
Modest increase in eastern North America
wintering population; downlisted from endangered to “species of concern” in
Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
Data quality is poor and geographic coverage
incomplete for most sea duck species |
|
Trends indicate declines in most species |
|
2 populations listed as threatened (spectacled
and Steller’s eiders) |
|
No other populations are at imminent risk |
|
Trends vary by species and region |
|
Causes of population changes largely unknown |
|
Species of greatest concern include eiders,
scoters, and long-tailed duck |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harvest is small relative to other waterfowl |
|
Subsistence harvest is important, but poorly
quantified |
|
Harvest restrictions implemented as a result of
concerns about population status |
|
Harvest
estimates are poor |
|
Hunter surveys inadequately sample sea duck
hunters |
|
Parts collection survey provides meager sample |
|
Improvements with HIP (Harvest information
Program) expected |
|
Subsistence surveys are being improved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coastal development; loss/degradation of
wintering habitat |
|
Large scale environmental changes (global
warming, regime shifts) |
|
Oil spills and effects of oil exploration and
development |
|
Excessive harvest |
|
Heavy metals found at elevated levels, but
effects unknown |
|
Disturbance or displacement from shipping |
|
Local problems (e.g., lead poisoning in Alaska;
shellfish aquaculture) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sea ducks represent 1/3 of North American
waterfowl species |
|
Most indices show depressed or declining
populations |
|
3 populations have been listed as threatened
since 1986 |
|
Poor information on which to base management of
these species |
|
International cooperation and coordinated
management is required |
|
|
|
|
One of the most ambitious continental wildlife
conservation initiatives ever attempted |
|
Goal is to restore waterfowl populations in
Canada, U.S., and Mexico to levels recorded during the 1970s |
|
Partnership-based Joint Ventures have been key
to its success |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historically, sport harvest of sea ducks has
been small, little attention paid to them |
|
Sea ducks were given no special attention by
North American Waterfowl Mgt Plan in 1986 |
|
Increased awareness of sea duck declines and
listing of 3 species prompted action |
|
1999:
Plan committee approves SDJV |
|
2001:
First official SDJV projects undertaken |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sea Duck Joint Venture partners promote the
conservation of North American sea ducks by providing greater knowledge and
understanding for effective management |
|
|
|
|
facilitate and support the development of
knowledge |
|
increase awareness of sea duck issues |
|
foster and develop conservation partnerships |
|
advance sea duck conservation |
|
|
|
|
The Sea Duck Joint Venture strives to maintain
sustainable populations of North American sea ducks throughout their ranges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delineation of populations |
|
Identification of important coastal habitats |
|
Population estimation and monitoring |
|
Contaminants and disease |
|
Population dynamics and ecology |
|
Harvest assessment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners contribute to SDJV mission by: |
|
Directing funds toward meeting SDJV information
needs |
|
Collaborating with partners to stimulate
advancement of sea duck science with available funds |
|
Providing technical advice and assistance to
cooperators who wish to contribute to meeting SDJV science objectives with
their own resources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expand partnership base |
|
Secure additional funding sources |
|
Continue and expand on science initiatives |
|
Outreach and education |
|
|
|
|
|
Sea Duck Conference, 6-10 Nov 2002, Victoria, BC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|